In the second aMap, I tried (crudely) to present the contrary position made mostly by Rocket Scientist (Stephanie) and Letters from Lausanne (Boris).
Apologies to all for hacking off some delicious fruit while doing this pruning. The purpose of this post is two-fold: 1) Introduce a widget that could be a constructive forum for arguments; 2) Use you as lab rats to assess the potential of this tool. Please build on either argument and help me put this tool to the test. If this is as snappy as it seems, I'll be happier than a pig in poop.
Do you like aMap, love it, hate it? Please put this through the paces and let me know. Let the kicking and giggling begin.
Update 1/26/09: One drawback to aMap I just noticed is that the title can't be edited once the widget code is created. My apologies for mispelling "enrich" as "engich". Although, that might also make an interesting argument.
Posts
Brian, this aMap is too cool!! A way to illustrate ideas. As far as religion and Science, they go perfectly. God created the heavens for us to explore, why else, wallpaper for our desktops? He gave us curiosity and a mind, we create the science to learn and explore what God has given us.
ReplyDeleteI'm liking aMap too.
ReplyDeleteBut I have a bone to pick with you that you didn't come to my rescue earlier while I was getting bludgeoned to a pulp by Stephanie and Boris. (Just kidding. Stephanie and Boris didn't use a bludgeon. I think it was a mallet instead! Just kidding again!)
I was tickled that the first can of worms I opened on the blog was handled very respectfully and intelligently on all sides.
I prefer the precision of a scalpel. Which is probably better than picking bones. Ouch!
ReplyDelete[Insert Bryan Adams' "Cuts Like a Knife" song here]
ReplyDeleteLol, I like "Cuts Like A Knife"
ReplyDelete